Ed Sheeran Wins "Thinking Out Loud" Copyright Lawsuit, Judge Rules No Infringement
Major Victory for Singer- Songwriter in Landmark Music Copyright Case
In a significant ruling for the music industry, a judge has ruled in favor of Ed Sheeran in the high
Details of the Copyright Infringement Claim
The lawsuit was brought forth by the heirs of Ed Townsend, the co
The Court's Decision and Legal Reasoning
After a trial, the jury delivered a verdict clearing Ed Sheeran of all allegations. The defense successfully argued that the common musical elements in question, such as a standard chord progression, are building blocks of music that cannot be owned by any one artist.
Sheeran himself testified and even performed parts of both songs live in the courtroom to demonstrate the differences. The judge's ruling emphasized that the two songs created a different "total concept and feel," which is a key test in copyright law.
Implications for Music Creation and Copyright Law
This verdict is seen as a crucial precedent for musicians and songwriters. It reinforces the principle that common, basic musical elements are part of the public domain and essential for creative expression. The outcome of this copyright lawsuit is expected to influence how similar cases are approached in the future.
- Affirms that common chord progressions are not copyrightable.
- Sets a benchmark for defining "substantial similarity" in music.
- Provides clarity for artists who build upon shared musical traditions.
For Sheeran, the ruling marks the end of a lengthy legal battle and a full vindication of his original work on "Thinking Out Loud."







Comments
Write a Comment